Search

Tips for Choosing and Evaluating online Continuing Medical Education Courses

Thanks to online and mobile learning, it is easier than ever to complete/continuing medical education, conveniently, and inexpensively. But with the influx of new providers coming to the market, it’s more important than ever to know what to look for. Choosing a CME (Continuing Medical Education) provider that is unfamiliar with your license renewal requirements can result in a bad experience and unneeded stress. We’ve put together a list to help you find the best fit for your CE needs

If you’re interested in a focused, skill-based continuing medical education/course—the kind that appears most likely to improve clinical outcomes—course descriptions and learning objectives provide limited information. Often, the only way to know whether a course truly matches what you’re looking for is to buy and take the course. And then, if the course wasn’t what you had in mind, you’re not likely to immediately seek out another course in the same content area.

Review the promotional materials and brochures, which should contain the following elements:
Course title/program description—Do they adequately describe program content? Is the program rationale clearly explained? Is the target audience clearly identified? Do I fit within that target audience? Is there a limit to the number of participants who may attend?
Learning outcomes—Are they stated? Do they indicate specifically what I will be able to do as a result of the program? Is the number of learning outcomes reasonable for the length of the program? Reviewing this element may help you distinguish broad overview courses from in-depth programs.
Faculty credentials—Do stated instructor qualifications lead you to believe a meaningful program will be delivered? Is the instructor presenting within his/her area of expertise?
Faculty disclosures—Has each instructor disclosed relevant financial and non-financial relationships (or lack thereof) related to the course content? Disclosures help you determine if the instructor has a bias toward the products, services or practices associated with the course. It is acceptable for an instructor to have a bias as long as it is disclosed.
Instructional methods—Are they described? Do they include active involvement of the audience?
Credit—Does the program offer ASHA CEUs? Is it offered by an ASHA Approved CE Provider? What are the criteria for satisfactory completion of the course and earning of ASHA CEUs?
Registration fees—Are they reasonable when compared to similar programs? If not, inquire.
Refund/cancellation policy—Is it clearly stated in the promotional materials?
Follow-up from program provider—Has the provider responded to your requests for additional information?

Want to read more such exciting articles and posts?

We will send you a monthly email with a digest of most happening news and events from the sector, straight to your inbox!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Latest Posts

FREE!

Download our free eBook on out-of-the-box Pharma product marketing ideas experimented, implemented, and accomplished by world-renowned players.

What's CME World?

At CME World we bring to you the best possible elearning medical webinars and courses which will help to build your evidence-based practice. We have partnerships and associations with major Indian and international associations, this helps us to design courses which are at par with international universities.

More Articles

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
Mayur Kumar

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy – A marketing strategy aid

COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy in the University of Notre Dame’s new test recommends that experts in unpredictable regions need to cooperate to beat the overall social crisis and that science can profit from utilizing immunization card advancements similar as their brands with clients do. “Market division procedures can be utilized to survive” COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy “and other wellbeing emergencies,” says Mitchell Olsen’s Journal of Consumer Affairs, Mitchell Olsen, speaker in publicizing at Mendoza College of Business, Notre Dame, with Matthew Meng of Utah State University. After the fundamental conveyance of COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy in mid–2021, some broad government assistance offices and officials acknowledged that by July fourth, mass opposition could be accomplished all through the US populace. Immunization rates started to decrease in pre–summer as individuals frantic to finish a neutralizer had so viably. Over 30% of grown–ups in the US are not yet completely immunized. The gathering led a public review of inoculation stocks to show how a pattern of market sharing can be productive. “Our survey found huge contrasts between four gatherings with decreased COVID–19 vaccine hesitancy in the nature and strength of the clarifications for their loathing for the immunizer and the reactions to which they are for the most part open,” said Olsen. “Now we discussed how affiliations, like the CDC, can select support trained professionals and purchaser specialists in future wellbeing crises.” In May, the gathering led a specialist review of 1,068 grown–ups in the United States.S. who were not inoculated or to some extent inoculated and viewed themselves as probably not going to be completely vaccinated. All individuals exhibited the significance of 16 clear explanations behind deciding not to be completely immunized. it trains them to be completely inoculated. Results, including portion profiles, were considered subsequent to partitioning respondents into one of four segments: unvaccinated refusals, unvaccinated reluctant, halfway refusals, or half delays. in the event that you can demonstrate that you will not or presumably not get the COVID19 immunizer or then again, if relevant, the back part. Read my more blogs from <a href=”https://www.cmeworld.org/author/mayurkumar/”>here</a>

Read More »

Stay in touch with us and grow your business!

© All Rights Reserved 2021